There’s a reason that they aren’t discussing whether Megalodon is still out there: “There is no evidence that megalodon is extant,” said Pimiento. “Sadly,” said Meyer, “none whatsoever.” “No,” confirmed Maisey. Holstein added another reason there’s no chance that Megalodons are still around.“Any statement that suggest this species is extant is science fiction.” “No convincing evidence exists to suggest that Megalodon is still extant,” added Kacev. “There is evidence that Megalodon pupped, or gave birth, in shallow coastal areas,” he said.“The main subject of my dissertation is to understand how, and hopefully why, it became extinct.” Aha! Surely must know about the debates that Sorensen speaks of.
Le bouton “vérifier” a deux utilisations :• un double-clique surveille en permanence votre progression ; • une simple pression signale vos erreurs rapidement.
Complétez les cases de la grille de Sudoku avec des chiffres de 1 à 9 afin qu’il n’y ait aucune répétition et aucun doublon dans chaque colonne, ligne et carré.
“So if these massive sharks were still around, they would be obvious.” “No scientist I’ve ever met thinks there are extant Megalodons roaming the oceans,” Kerstetter affirmed. No shark scientist in the world thinks that there is any truth to the idea that Megalodon is still alive.
Sorensen’s defense of the “documentary” simply doesn’t hold water. Either Sorensen is continuing to lie to Discovery viewers, or he really is that out of touch with the science he’s in charge of producing. Even still, network spokesperson Laurie Goldberg says the channel stands by what they did.
Neuf cases constituent chacune de ces divisions.• Le but du jeu est de remplir toutes les cases vides avec un chiffre de 1 à 9, jusqu’à ce que la grille soit complète.• Ça se corse : il ne faut JAMAIS avoir deux fois le même chiffre dans chaque ligne, colonne et carré.• On inscrit un seul chiffre par case et il n’est pas possible de modifier les chiffres proposés au départ.
Aucun calcul n’est nécessaire.• En bref : Complétez les cases de la grille avec des chiffres de 1 à 9 afin qu’il n’y ait aucune répétition et aucun doublon dans chaque colonne, ligne et carré.Fossil evidence demonstrate it became extinct around 2 million years ago, that is, before humans first appeared in the fossil record.” So, it doesn’t matter if you talk to shark scientists that study ecology, fisheries, genetics or paleontology. Simply feeding a body of that size would mean they had “a tremendous caloric demand,” but the energy requirement would be even higher if these large sharks were living in that ‘95% of the ocean’ that we haven’t explored because those places are deep and really, cold.When asked if there is a debate about Megalodon’s extinction, the answer from scientists is a clear and resounding no. “If Megalodon were extant, it would either be living in surface waters (where it would have been seen/caught/killed by SOMEONE) or in deeper mesopelagic/bathypelagic/abyssopelagic waters (with insufficient prey biomass and cooler temperatures).” To put it simply: there isn’t enough to eat where they wouldn’t be seen, and there’s just no way we wouldn’t have seen them if they lived where there is enough food for them to survive.Funny, because all I remember was a too-fast-to-read disclaimer at the end that said: None of the institutions or agencies that appear in the film are affiliated with it in any way, nor have approved its contents.Though certain events and characters in this film have been dramatized, sightings of “Submarine” continue to this day. Legends of giant sharks persist all over the world. First off, I don’t think the word “novel” means what you think it means, Goldberg. There’s nothing new or unique about a network creating a visually entertaining fictional story—that’s exactly what every other channel on TV does .“The fossil record of Megalodon ends in the Pliocene,” he told me conclusively. ” “It isn’t a subject for serious scientific discussion,” he continued.